Which of the following is a consequence of non-compliance with safety standards?

The selection regarding the potential increased risk of accidents and injuries as a consequence of non-compliance with safety standards is accurate because safety standards are put in place to protect individuals and ensure safe practices in environments that involve electrical systems and other hazardous materials. When these standards are not followed, there is a greater possibility that unsafe conditions will arise, which can lead to accidents like electrical shock, equipment failures, or even fires. Such incidents not only endanger human life but can also cause significant damage to property and disruption to operations. Adhering to safety standards helps mitigate these risks by ensuring that systems are designed and operated in a manner that prioritizes safety and minimizes hazards.

The other alternatives do not align with the implications of non-compliance. Increased efficiency of electrical systems, simplified installation processes, and lower operational costs are typically benefits associated with adherence to best practices and standards rather than consequences of neglecting them. Non-compliance generally leads not to improvements in these areas but to issues such as inefficiencies, complexities, and potentially higher costs from remedial actions or legal liabilities.